Manish Kumar @ Mannish Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22334 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-718 Year-2024 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Manish Kumar @ Mannish Sinha S/o Jawahar Prasad @ Jawahar Singh Resident of village Karariya, P.S.- Gopalganj, Distt.- Gopalganj (P.S.- Karariya O.P. and Kuchaikot has wrongly been mentioned in the FIR) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2025

1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Ahiyapur Police Station Case No. 718 of 2024, dated 02.06.2024, disclosing offences punishable under Sections 343/345/348/385/420/406/467/462/307/120-B/ 387/314/376/376(1)/376(2)/377/369/366-A of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, as per the complaint -cum-First Information Report, is that co-accused Tilak Kumar Singh established physical relationship with the complainant/ informant on the pretext of marriage with the help of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22334 of 2025(2) dt.01-05-2025 2/3

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner alleged and he has falsely been implicated in this case on account of the fact that the petitioner is the Director of D.B.R. Unique Company, having its head office at NOIDA. The company deals in the ayurvedic medicines and cosmetic goods and training of sales and marketing personal. The complainant was working with the coaccused Tilak Kumar Singh, who was a distributor of the company. There is no allegation against the petitioner that he established physical relationship with the complainant/ informant.

5. Regards being had to the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that there is no allegation of establishing physical relationship against the petitioner and the petitioner is the Director of the Company, of which co-accused Tilak Kumar Singh was a distributor, I am inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.

6. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22334 of 2025(2) dt.01-05-2025 3/3 four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Court, POCSO 03, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Ahiyapur Police Station Case No. 718 of 2024, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √