← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22101/2022bail granted

Kumar Nagmani @ Nagmani Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-09Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22101 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-543 Year-2021 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== KUMAR NAGMANI @ NAGMANI SINGH Son of Ramanand Singh Resident of village - Khilwat, P.S.- Bidupur, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shivjee Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 09-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case no. 543 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3⁄4 of the Explosive Substance Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, after breaking the lock of the school gate, petitioner entered there and looted away Rs. 30,000/- and on objection, petitioner damaged several items of school office. It is further alleged that the petitioner and other accused persons exploded bombs and started indiscriminate firing as a result of which several persons got injured. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22101 of 2022(3) dt.09-11-2022 2/2 has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Informant wants to grab the land of the petitioner situated near the school. Petitioner is a chronic patient of kidney and his kidney has been transplanted and he is unable to move freely. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against him.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail and submitted that petitioner has one criminal antecedent.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case no. 543 of 2021, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Vaishali at Hajipur subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U