Kumod Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7570 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -241 Year- 2016 Thana -SAUR BAZAR District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Kumod Yadav Son of Tarni Yadav

2. Ranvir Kumar @ Badal Son of Vidyanand Yadav Both residents of Village - Khopaiti, Police Station - Sour Bazar, District - Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2017 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sour Bazar P.S. Case No. 241 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 385, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that allegation against petitioner no. 1 is that he assaulted the informant by butt portion of pistol and the allegation against petitioner no. 2 is that he assaulted the informant by farsa, however, the injuries caused on the person of the informant is found to be simple in nature.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that there is land dispute between the parties and the injuries caused to the informant is found to be simple in nature, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7570 of 2017 (2) dt.27-02-2017 2/2 below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Saharsa in connection with Sour Bazar P.S. Case No. 241 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

This is further subject to the conditions that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U