Krishna Yadav @ Krishna Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49913 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -501 Year- 2014 Thana -GAYA MUFFSIL District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Krishna Yadav @ Krishna Prasad Son of Late Shiv Nandan Gope @ Shiv Nandan Yadav R/o Village Tulshi Bigha (Ritu Bigha), P.S. Mufassil, District Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narsing Tanti(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-05-2015 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 501 of 2014 for the offence under Sections 353, 341, 323, 379, 427 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. as the accused who along with other accused persons allegedly indulged into altercation and thereafter scuffle on the question of making protest, when he asked the informant and his colleagues to take away the motorcycle parked there. The allegation is that in such altercation, these petitioners indulged into assault with lathi, danda and also snatched I. Card and cash amount. The allegation is that by this acts of commission or omission these

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49913 of 2014 (2) dt.07-05-2015 petitioners thus, interrupted the informant and his colleagues from performing their duties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the main allegation is against one Shambhu Yadav. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The occurrence is said to have taken place due to parking of motorcycle, which resulted into hot exchange of words between both the parties.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 501 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Sudhir Singh, J) P.K./- U T