← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11759/2017bail granted

Mehan Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-22Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11759 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -102 Year- 2016 Thana -RAXAUL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Mehan Khatoon Wife of Shahid Mian, Resident of Village- Ahirwan Tola, Ward No. 7, P.S.- Raxaul, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Raxaul P.S. case no. 102 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 366A/34 of Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that he is the mother of main accused Fulmohammad Mian. The victim has already been married with Fulmohammad Mian and she is living with him which is clear from her statement under Section 164 of Code of Criminal Procedure.

As per written report, the petitioner and other accused persons have kidnapped his minor daughter. After recovery of the victim girl, her statement was recorded under

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11759 of 2017 (2) dt.22-03-2017 2/2 Section 164 of Code of Criminal Procedure (Annexure-2) where she has specifically stated that she has married with Fulmohammad Mian, son of this petitioner and living with him at Delhi as husband and wife. They have also performed court marriage in Gaziabad. The girl has stated her age as 22 years in her statement recorded under Section 164 of Code of Criminal Procedure whereas court has assessed her age as 18 years. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Raxaul P.S. case no. 102 of 2016, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sanjay Priya, J.) rinkee/- U T