Anjani Kumar Sinha v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15291 of 2015 ====================================================== Anjani Kumar Sinha, Son of Sachchidanand Sinha, Resident of VillageKahardih, P.S. Khaira, District Jamui. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, New Delhi.

2. The Security & Exchange Board of India through its Local Office at Patna.

3. The Central Bureau of Investigation through its Local Office at Patna.

4. The State of Bihar.

5. The District Magistrate, Jamui.

6. The Superintendent of Police, Jamui.

7. M/s Ramel Industries Ltd. (also known as R- Ramel Real Estate and Infrastructure Ltd.) through its Head Office-15, Krishna Nagar Road, Barasat, Kolkata- 700126.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Satya Prakash Prashar, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. D.K. Sinha, A.A.G.-2 Mr. Alok Kumar Rahi, AC to AAG-2 For respondent No.3 : Mr. Bipin Bihari Sinha, SC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 21-01-2016 Heard Mr. Satya Prakash Prashar, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. D. K. Sinha, learned Additional Advocate General No.2, appearing for the State respondents. Also heard Mr. Bipin Bihari Sinha, learned Standing Counsel, appearing for respondent No.3. After some arguments, Mr. Satya Prakash Prashar, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach the

Patna High Court CWJC No.15291 of 2015 (2) dt.21-01-2016 2/2 competent authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Sunil/- U