Patna High CourtMJC/3002/2014disposed

Umesh Chandra And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-08-19Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3002 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9544 of 1993 ===========================================================

1. Umesh Chandra aged about 56 years

2. Prafulla Chandra aged about 49 years

3. Vijay Chandra aged about 45 years All S/o Late Vishwakarma Resident of Block No. 10, Flat No. L-F 1/55, Rajendra Nagar Police Station, Kadamkuan, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar having his office in Old Secretariat, P.S. Sachiwalya, District Patna.

2. Sri Kuldeep Narayan S/o Name not known to the petitioner Presently posted as Municipal Commissioner having his office at Mauryalok Complex, P.S. Kotwali, District Patna.

3. Miss. Arti, the Secretary cum Manager, Estate, Patna Municipal Corporation, having her office at Mauryalok Complex, P.S. Kotwali, District Patna.

4. Sri Sandeep Poundrik S/o Name not known to the petitioner The Secretary under Development Department, Govt. of Bihar having his office at Vikas Bhawan, P.S. Sachivalaya, District Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikas Mohan For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nawal kishore Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-08-2015 *************** 19.08.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

It is the stand of the counsel representing the petitioners that they are willing to accept the offer made by the Municipal Corporation of Patna. They are also willing to comply with the direction and the demand made therein, provided a reasonable time is granted to them.

This aspect of the matter can very well be

Patna High Court MJC No.3002 of 2014 dt.19-08-2015 2/2 considered by the opposite parties. The Court has no discretion in the matter.

Contempt Application stands disposed off.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) U SKM/-