Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19521/2019bail granted

Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-02Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19521 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-491 Year-2018 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka * ====================================================== PAPPU YADAV Son of Masudi Yadav, Resident of Village-Goraiy, Police Station-Fullidumar, District-Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Mukherjee For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 02-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 307379,504,506/34 IPC registered in connection with Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. Case No. 491 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute between the parties. The allegations are general and omnibus in nature There is no specific accusation of assault against the petitioner. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Be that as it may, in the event of petitioner's arrest or surrender within four weeks hereof let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- [ten thousand] with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Banka in connection with Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. Case No. 491 of 2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19521 of 2019(2) dt.02-04-2019 2/2 subject to the following further conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T