Raj Kumar Chaurasia v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.69500 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-292 Year-2018 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Raj Kumar Chaurasia, son of Kamleshwari Chaurasia @ Kamleshwari Prasad Chaurasia, resident of village, Barhara, Police Station, Gogri, Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Gogri P.S. Case No.292 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363 and 366 A of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant is father of the girl who in his written complaint has alleged that his girl was married and she came to her matrimonial house and on 17.08.2018 she had gone outside to attend the call of nature but thereafter she did not return. The girl was recovered and in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., she has stated that she had gone with the petitioner out of her sweet will and volition and she had also solemnized marriage with him and she has not been kidnapped. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 03.09.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69500 of 2018(2) dt.06-12-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No.292 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T