Ravi Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12379 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -180 Year- 2016 Thana -JAYNAGAR District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Ravi Ranjan, son of Late Lambodar Mallick, resident of Village- Sidhap Kala, Police Station- Ladania & District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Murlidhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 180 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegation is that petitioner has withdrawn the pension of three persons even after their death and, as such, he has committed fraud of Rs.7,45,200/-. However, petitioner has deposited Rs.3,50,000/- in this case and he is ready to deposit the rest amount if he is found guilty in the case.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12379 of 2017 (2) dt.24-03-2017 2/2 petitioner has deposited almost half of the total defalcated amount, as such, let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks along with Bank Guarantee for the remaining amount and on being satisfied with the Bank Guarantee the learned court below will release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to its satisfaction, subject to the conditions that petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available before the police as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates, the prosecution shall be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds and further petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U