← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24488/2023disposed

Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-11Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24488 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-692 Year-2022 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.

Sunil Kumar Son Of Ram Nandan Kumar R/O Flat No. 103, Krishna Kunj Apartment, Road No. 8, S.K. Nagar, Ps- Buddha Colony, Dist- Patna 2.

Meera Kumari Wife Of Sunil Kumar R/O Flat No. 103, Krishna Kunj Apartment, Road No. 8, S.K. Nagar, Ps- Buddha Colony, Dist- Patna 3.

Lavanya Nidhi @ Sonu Son Of Sunil Kumar R/O Flat No. 103, Krishna Kunj Apartment, Road No. 8, S.K. Nagar, Ps- Buddha Colony, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Jyoti Priya Wife of Lalan Kumar, Daughter of Krishna Mohan Choudhary R/V- Shajanand Nagar, Ward no. 41, PS- Mufassil, Dist- Begusarai ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sarvottam Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP Mr. Hare Krishna Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-07-2023 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 is directed to file an affidavit for his client as to whether any settlement has been arrived at between the parties. List this case after one week.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has produced a supplementary affidavit and the same is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners has produced supplementary affidavit annexing compromise petition filed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24488 of 2023(2) dt.11-07-2023 2/2 between the parties in the Court below and has submitted that both the parties have settled their disputes and the O.P. No. 2 is staying with her in-laws.

Learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 also submits that he has instruction not to oppose the application. This application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move before the Court below on the basis of compromise petition and if the compromise is supported by the O.P. No. 2, the prosecution of the petitioners shall be dropped and if the compromise petition is not supported by the O.P. No. 2 then the Court below will pass an appropriate order. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application is disposed of.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T