Amiri Sah @ Amiri Lal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22038 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2021 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

AMIRI SAH @ AMIRI LAL SAH Son of Lakhan Sah Resident of Village - Raghopur, Balat , P.S.- Rajnagar, Distt.- Madhubani. 2.

Rajendra Sah Son of Amiri Sah @ Amiri Lal Sah Resident of Village - Raghopur, Balat , P.S.- Rajnagar, Distt.- Madhubani. 3.

Jagarnath Sah Son of Amiri Sah @ Amiri Lal Sah Resident of Village - Raghopur, Balat , P.S.- Rajnagar, Distt.- Madhubani. 4.

Birendra Sah Son of Amiri Sah @ Amiri Lal Sah Resident of Village - Raghopur, Balat , P.S.- Rajnagar, Distt.- Madhubani. 5.

Chandan Sah Son of RAjendra Sah Resident of Village - Raghopur, Balat , P.S.- Rajnagar, Distt.- Madhubani.

6.

Sanjay Sah Son of Birendra Sah Resident of Village - Raghopur, Balat , P.S.- Rajnagar, Distt.- Madhubani.

7.

Ajay Sah Son of Birendra Sah Resident of Village - Raghopur, Balat , P.S.- Rajnagar, Distt.- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 29-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 504, 506, 323, 324, 325, 354 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, it is a case of assault due to which informant and other persons sustained injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22038 of 2022(2) dt.29-09-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both parties have sustained injuries, as alleged, in separate occurrence. He further submits that the injuries were found to be simple in nature. Petitioners have clean antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Madhubani in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 166 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U