Sita Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21145 of 2014 ====================================================== Sita Ram Singh Son of Late Chatur Singh R/o Village Gheghata, P.S. Arrah Mufassil, P.O. Saraian, District Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through D.M., Bhojpur, Arrah
2. Anchala Adhikari ,Bhojpur, Arrah Block
3. D.C.L.R. Bhojpur, Ara
4. The Sahid Ikbal Haqlka Karamchari Halka No 8, Ara B.D.O. Block Ara
5. Ram Lal Sah son of Uma Sah R/o Village Gheghata, P.S. Arrah Mufassil, P.O. Saraian, District Bhojpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Lallan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, AC to GP 3 For the Respondent No.5 : Mr. Anish Chandra Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-10-2016 After some argument, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, in presence of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to approach the prescribed revisional authority under the provisions of The Bihar Land Mutation Act, 2011 (in short "the Act, 2011") for grant of appropriate relief(s) to the petitioner with respect to the lands in question as also the impugned orders passed by the appellate authority as also the original authority.
Permission is accorded.
The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
If an appropriate revision application is filed on behalf of the petitioner, after impleading all the necessary parties including the private respondent herein, within a period of three weeks from today with a certified copy of the present order and if
Patna High Court CWJC No.21145 of 2014 (2) dt.22-10-2015 2/2 it is found to have become barred by limitation and if any petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner for condonation of such delay, then the learned revisional authority shall take into consideration that on a bona fide legal advice, the present writ petition was filed before this Court on 10.12.2014 and that remained pending till date.
It is clarified that the parties shall be at liberty to raise all the issues of facts and law, which may be available to them, with respect to the lands in question as also the orders impugned before the prescribed revisional authority.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Tahir/- U