Raushan Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19972 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2012 Thana- NOWKOTHI GARHPURA DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== RAUSHAN MAHTO, Son of Faudar Mahto, Resident of Village - Samsa, P.S. - Nawkothi, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashi Dhar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-06-2020 The matter has been taken up through virtual Court proceeding.

Defects, if any, be removed within fifteen days of the start of the physical Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 341, 342 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Though the petitioner is alleged to be a member of the unlawful assembly, however, no overt act is alleged against the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 04.02.2019. Earlier prayer for bail was refused by order dated 16.12.2019 with liberty to renew the prayer for bail after

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19972 of 2020(2) dt.26-06-2020 2/2 framing of the charges.

Submission is that charges have already been framed. Considering the entire facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with S.T. No. 478 of 2019 arising out of Nawkothi Police Station Case No. 06 of 2012, subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned trial court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T