Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22979/2026dismissed

Md Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-30Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22979 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Md Hussain son of Md. Kalam Resident of village- Rasalpur Ps -Paroo District -Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mayank Raj, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Muzaffarpur Cyber P.S.Case No. 43 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 3(5), 111(2), 319, 318(4), 336(3) of BNS as well as section 66 (B) ( C ), (D) of I.T. Act.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 10.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 64037 of 2025, which reads as under:

"Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muzaffarpur Cyber P.S.Case No. 43 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 3(5), 111(2), 319, 318(4), 336(3) of BNS as well as section 66 (B) ( C ), (D) of I.T.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22979 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 2/2 Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner has been caught committing cyber fraud. One Laptop and eight mobile phones were recovered from possession of the petitioner.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 23.05.2025.

5. Considering the facts that the petitioner is involved in cyber fraud, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that the charges have been framed.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence, the fact that the trial has started and no fresh ground for grant of bail is made out, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T