Pankaj Yadav @ Pankaj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22287 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2018 Thana- PURAINI District- Madhepura ====================================================== Pankaj Yadav @ Pankaj Kumar Yadav, Son of Lakshmi Yadav Resident of Village - Gwalpara, Ward No.06, P.S.- Gwalpara, Distt.- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mrigendra Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2019 The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Puraini P.S.Case No. 204 of 2018 registered under Sections 307, 324, 363 and 366/34 of the Indian penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
Petitioner is not named in the FIR and allegation is of kidnapping the married daughter of the informant. It further appears that in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., victim girl has named the petitioner and alleged act is attributed against him.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is not named in the FIR and no specific allegation has been attributed against him and later on he has been falsely implicated in this case by the victim girl who was major at that time.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22287 of 2019(2) dt.08-04-2019 2/2 Heard learned APP also who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that not even in FIR, three unnamed persons, concealing their face, have been mentioned but in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., petitioner has been named along with other accused persons and there is allegation against all of them that they were firing.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to him rather he should surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and make prayer for regular bail, which shall be considered and disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sujit/- U T