Patna High CourtCWJC/13145/2013disposed

M/S Opera Dreams And ANR v. Patna Municipal Corporation And ORS

2015-07-24Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.13145 of 2013 (2) dt.24-07-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13145 of 2013 ======================================================

1. M/S Opera Dreams, A Partnership Firm, Having Its Office At 502, 4th Floor, Krishna Mathura Complex, Circular Road, P.O And P.S- Lalpur, District- Ranchi In The State Of Jharkhand Represented Through One Of It'S Partners Namely Prakhar Jaipuriar S/O Late Braj Bihari Narayan Resident Of Children Convent, Indrapuri, Road No. 2, Ratu Road, P.OHehal, Police Station- Sukhdeo Nagar, Ranchi, Jharkhand

2. Prakhar Jaipuriar S/O Late Braj Bihari Narayan Resident Of Children Convent, Indrapuri, Road No. 2, Ratu Road, P.O- Hehal, Police StationSukhdeo Nagar, Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Patna Municipal Corporation Through The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Having It'S Registered Office At Mauryalok Complex, , Opp. Kotwali Police Station, Patna- 800001.

2. Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

3. The Assistant Engineer, Patna Municipal Corporation.

4. The Executive Engineer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

5. The Junior Engineer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

6. The Vigilance Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna Having Its Registered Office At Maurya Lok Complex, Opp. Kotwali, Police Station- Patna- 800001. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Pratap Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Hargovind Singh Himkar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-07-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for the present they do not have any grievance as the respondents have restrained themselves from interfering with their right. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of. In case the petitioners are aggrieved by any further action of the respondents, they would be at liberty to challenge the same.

(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) Shashi./- U