Priyanka Kumari @ Priyanka Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6427 of 2024 ====================================================== Priyanka Kumari @ Priyanka Devi Wife of Chandan Kumar Bharti, Resident of Village- Ghorhat, P.O. Ghorhat Mathia, Block - Manjhi, P.S. - Manjhi, Gram Panchayat Raj- Ghorhat, Ward No. 15, District- Saran, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Deputy Director, Social Welfare, Saran, Chapra, Bihar. 3.

The District Magistrate, Saran, Chapra, Bihar. 4.

The District Programme Officer (I.C.D.S.), Saran, Chapra, Bihar. 5.

The Child Development Project Officer, Manjhi Anchal, Saran, Bihar. 6.

Shilpi Kumari, Wife of Chandan Kumar Bharti, Resident of Village - Ghorhat, P.O. Ghorhat Mathia, Block - Manjhi, P.S. - Manjhi, Ward No. 15, District- Saran, Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikas Ratan Bharti, Advocate Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocate Mr.Kumar Abhishek, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Government Pleader (27) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 26-04-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of certiorarifor quashing the Order dated 04.09.2023 passed by the Learned District Magistrate, Saran, Chapra in Aanganwadi Appeal Case no. 09/ 2021 (Shilpi Kumari -v- Priyanka Kumari).

(ii) To issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of

Patna High Court CWJC No.6427 of 2024(2) dt.26-04-2024 2/2 mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to reinstate the petitioner on the post of Aanganwadi Sevika in Village Ghorhat, Ward No. 15, Block- Manjhi, P.S. Manjhi, District- Saran, Biharand to pay all the consequential benefits after reinstatement of service"

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U