Tripurari Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.631 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8447 of 2020 ====================================================== Tripurari Prasad Son of Late Raj Kumar Prasad Sinha Resident of VillageChandaura, P.S.-Kako, District-Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner.

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Bihar Patna.

2.

Mr. Chatanya Prasad Son of not Known to the Petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Son of not Known to the Petitioner, the Special Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Bihar, Patna. 4.

Mr. S.K. Singhal, Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna Cum Chairman of Director General Board.

5.

Mr. J.S. Gangwar, Son of not Known to the Petitioner, the Additional Director General of Police (Headquarter) Cum Member Director General Board.

6.

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Son of not Known to the Petitioner, the Additional Director General of Police, Crime Investigation Department and Weaker Section Wing Cum Member Director General Board. 7.

Mr. Paras Nath, Inspector General of Police, (Budget/Appeal/Welfare), Bihar Patna Cum Member Secretary Director General Board. 8.

Mr. Ganesh Kumar Son of not Known to the Petitioner, the Inspector General of Police, (Headquarter), Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Vinay Ranjan, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj (GP-5).

Mr.Shailesh Kumar, AC to GP-5.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL ORDER 06-10-2023 Pursuant to the previous order, personal affidavit of opposite party no.4 has been filed so also the supplementary show cause along with affidavit and Annexures- OP1/A, OP1/B, OP1/C and OP1/D have been filed on behalf of the opposite

Patna High Court MJC No.631 of 2022(13) dt.06-10-2023 2/2 party nos.1 and 2. These two sets of documents, it is evident that orders of this Court has been complied including the payments with reference to calculation.

2. Accordingly, the present M.J.C./Contempt Petition stands dropped reserving liberty to the petitioner in the event of any disputed payments to approach the competent authority by making a detailed representation. Such representation should be considered by the competent authority and in accordance with law.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) P.S./-Manish/- U