Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20065/2020disposed

Ramdeo Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

2020-06-23Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20065 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2020 Thana- GHORASAHAN DistrictEast Champaran ====================================================== 1.

RAMDEO MUKHIYA Son of Late Palak Mukhiya Resident of Village - Katgenwa, P.S. Nakardehi, District East Champaran. 2.

Santosh Mukhiya Bin @ Santosh Mukhiya Son of Kamal Mukhiya Bin Resident of Village- Nansagra Dhath, P.S. Simron Garh, District Bara (Nepal) ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Dilip Kumar Tondon, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 23-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners through video conference. Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter shall be removed, and compliance with the conditions of the notices of this Court with regard to acceptance of e-filing shall be made, without delay immediately after the lockdown ends, and in any event within one month thereof.

2. The petitioners are in custody since 24.03.2020 in connection with Ghorasahan (Jitna) P.S. Case No. 107 of 2020 for the offences alleged under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20065 of 2020(2) dt.23-06-2020 2/2

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 306 litres of Nepali Kasturi liquor. It is further submitted that the said goods have not been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners and the recovery of the said goods has been made from a sack thrown by co-accused persons. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 24.03.2020, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Ghorasahan (Jitna) P.S. Case No. 107 of 2020, if he is not otherwise required in any other case.

5. Office shall ensure that all defects have been removed and compliance with the notices of this Court has been made, within the stipulated time as provided in para-1 hereinabove.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T