Rajiv Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16931 of 2017 (2) dt.11-05-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16931 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -85 Year- 2016 Thana -RANIYATALAB District- PATNA ====================================================== Rajiv Kumar, Son of Ramesh Singh, resident of Village - Bara, P.S. Rani Talab, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Parashuram Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandrasen Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 11-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 85 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per written report while the informant was sleeping in the Verandah, this petitioner entered into the Verandah and tried to outrage her modesty.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the case has been lodged due to land dispute. From the written report it appears that general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16931 of 2017 (2) dt.11-05-2017 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 85 of 2016, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Ranjeet Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Danapur, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T