Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.639 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18307 of 2021 ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar, Son of Late Ramashish Prasad Singh Resident of VillageBerhna, Ward No.-07, Bujuruk Tola, P.S.-Barh, Distirct-Patna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Mr. Amir Subhani, Chief Secretary, Govt. of BIhar, Patna.

2.

Mr. Anand Kishore, Principal Secretary, Urban Housing and Development Department.

3.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Aggarwal, Commissioner, Patna. 4.

Dr. Chandra Shekhar Singh District Magistrate, Patna. 5.

Mr. Navkunj Kumar, Block Development Officer, Barh. 6.

Mr. Kundan Kumar, Sub-Division Officer, Barh. 7.

Mr. jitendra Kumar, Circle Officer, Barh, Patna. 8.

Mr. S.K. Singhal, Director General of Police, Police Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

9.

Mr. Manjit Singh Dhillo, Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 10.

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Superintendent of Police, Rrdal, Patna. 11.

Mr. Janardhan Prasad Verma Executive Engineer, Office of Nagar Parishad, Barh, Patna.

12.

Murli Prasad Yadav Son of Late Ram Kishun Prasad Resident of MohallaBazidpur, Ward no-03, Station Road, Barh, Patna. 13.

Abhinash Kumar Yadav Son of Murli Prasad Yadav Resident of MohallaBazidpur, Ward NO.-03, Station Road, Barh, Patna. 14.

Sanjay Yadav Son of Murli Prasad Yadav Resident of Mohalla-Bazidpur, Ward no-03, Station Road, Barh, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Prasad Sinha, AAG-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

Patna High Court MJC No.639 of 2022(6) dt.09-01-2024 2/2 09-01-2024 On the previous occasion, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to peruse the show cause along with the documents. Today also learned counsel for the petitioner is seeking time and it is declined for the reasons that there is compliance of the orders of this Court on 18.12.2023 vide Annexure-A to the Show Cause dated 20th December, 2023. We are satisfied with the compliance.

2. Accordingly, the present M.J.C/Contempt petition stands dropped reserving liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 18.12.2023 in accordance with law, if so advised. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) manish/- U