Ranjan Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar @ Motka v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22482 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2018 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
RANJAN YADAV @ RANJAN KUMAR @ MOTKA S/o Manoj Yadav Resident of Village- Dewariya, Khamaini, P.S.- Jehanabad, Distt- Jehanabad. 2.
Gaya Yadav @ Tutu S/o Mannu Yadav Resident of Village- Dewariya, P.S.- Jehanabad, Distt- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.
The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of lifting of the lockdown in the State of Bihar.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of I.P.C.
Prosecution case, in short, is that four unknown
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22482 of 2020(2) dt.15-09-2020 2/2 miscreants forcibly entered into the truck and snatched the key of the truck from the driver by assaulting him and took away the truck along with driver and on the way stepped down the driver from the truck and tied him into the room of school by gamchha and fled away with the truck.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 6.2.2020. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. Their name has come in this case on confessional statement of co-accused Praduman Kumar. The petitioners have not been put on T.I.P. There is no recovery of any incriminating article from the possession of the petitioners.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are not named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Jehanabad in connection with Kako P.S. case No.221 of 2018. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T