Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66703/2018bail granted

Sudama Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-26Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.66703 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -159 Year- 2017 Thana -CHANDAN District- BANKA ====================================================== Sudama Singh, Son of Chhedi Singh, Resident of Kusum Ghat, P.S. Anandpur O.P. District-Banka .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chandan P.S. Case No.159 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner who is Manager of PACS and Chairman of PACS is defalcation of Rs.21,49,927/- as he did not deposit the amount in the bank for the financial year 2015-16. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as soon as the money was made available to him, the same was deposited in the Government bank account and now no amount is due against PACS. Petitioner is in custody since 7.7.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66703 of 2018 (2) dt.26-11-2018 2/2 case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Chandan P.S. Case No.159 of 2017, with following conditions :-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjeev/- U T