Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21198/2026bail granted

Aditya Raj v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-06Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21198 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2026 Thana- BITHAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Aditya Raj Son of Ram Briksh Sahni @ Ram Briksh Sahani Resident of village- Dhamaun, Ps- Patori, Dist- Samastipur 2.

Murari Kumar Son of Arjun Mukhia Resident of village- Sirsiya, ps- Bithan, Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bithan P.S. Case No. 09 of 2026 registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and others are accused of assaulting the victims causing injuries to them.

4. The petitioners are in custody since 27.01.2026.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and there is general and omnibus

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21198 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026 2/2 allegations against the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application is allowed.

7. Let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned Court below in connection with Bithan P.S. Case No. 09 of 2026.

8. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U