Hritik Mahto @ Ritik Kumar @ Ritik Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32479 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2020 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== HRITIK MAHTO @ RITIK KUMAR @ RITIK RAJ Son of Shyam Mahto @ Shyam Babu Mahto Resident of Village- Sonbarsa, Ward No.11, P.S.- Sonbarsa, Dist- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashhar Mustafa For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-03-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been arrested during the pendency of the anticipatory bail application and, as such, the same has become infructuous. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the application.

Permission is accorded. The application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided hereinabove,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32479 of 2021(2) dt.30-03-2022 2/2 failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T