← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13831/2015disposed

Mani Lal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-01-19Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13831 of 2015 ====================================================== Mani Lal Yadav Son of Late Bhuneshwar Yadav resident of village - Fatehpur, P.O. Makhdumpur, P.S. Makhdumpur, District - Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, General Administration Deptt., Bihar, Patna 2.

The District Magistrate - cum - Collector, Jehanabad 3.

The District Dy. Collector (Establishment) Jehanabad 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad 5.

The Circle Officer, Makhdumpur, District - Jehanabad 6.

The Station House Officer, Makhdumpur, District - Jehanabad ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that father of the petitioner, who was working on the post of Chowkidar in Makhdumpur Police Station under Makhdumpur Circle, died in harness on 28.07.2009 due to illness. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application before the S.H.O. Makhdumpur on 08.12.2009 and before the Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad on 12.12.2009 for appointment to the post of Chowkidar on compassionate ground. It is further submitted that the petitioner was asked by the local authority to submit application in proper format and accordingly, the petitioner submitted application twice before the authority concerned, but till date, no order has been passed on his application.

Patna High Court CWJC No.13831 of 2015(2) dt.19-01-2023 2/2 In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, the respondent no. 2 (District Magistrate, Jehanabad) / concerned respondent is directed to consider the application of the petitioner in accordance with law and pass a reasoned and speaking order after hearing the parties within a period of three months from the date of receipt / production of copy of this order.

With above observation, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U