Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19533/2019bail granted

Satendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-02Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19533 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-361 Year-2015 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== SATENDRA PRASAD Son of Late Shivnandan Prasad, Director of Adarsh Sarvodaya Vidyalaya, Police Station-Hilsa, District-Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tej Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 02-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147,148, 149, 323, 337, 353, 427,283, 332, 307, 504 IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act and Section 151 of the Railways Act, registered in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 361/2015.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the FIR is against 27 named and 300-400 unknown persons. The accusations are general and omnibus in nature without any specific accusation attributed to the petitioner. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 361/2015 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19533 of 2019(2) dt.02-04-2019 2/2 i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner. ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T