Kamala Kant Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14836 of 2015 ====================================================== Kamala Kant Thakur son of Late Panchanand Thakur, Resident of MohallaTopkhana Bazar Katghar, P.s.- Kotwali Munger, District- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar Patna 3.

The District Education Officer, Munger 4.

The District Programme Officer Establishment, Munger null null 5.

The Block Education Officer, Munger Sadar, Munger 6.

The Headmaster, Balak Middle School, Chhoti Kala Bari, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Munger ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhola Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raghwendra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 21-02-2023 Petitioner has prayed as under :- "A. For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to grant Second ACP and MACP to the petitioner from the due date along with statutory interest and its consequential benefits.

B. For directing the respondents concerned to pay the arrears of salary for the period 2.10.1992 to 25.1.1994 as due to him along with statutory interest and its consequential benefits and also pay the arrears of salary for 97 days in the terms of Letter No.54952 dated 23.1.1997. (Annexure 3). C. For further directing the respondents to pay the arrears of different salary for the period 14.7.2005 to 2.5.2007 as due to him along with statutory interest.

D. For passing any other order/s, command/s or appropriate writ/s which your

Patna High Court CWJC No.14836 of 2015(2) dt.21-02-2023 2/2 Lordships deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the instant case."

In the counter affidavit, it has been stated that the the petitioner had also earlier approached this High Court and directions were issued to decide his representation, whereafter his representation was decided and the impugned order was withdrawn and the claim for payment of the salary on the basis of order dated 23.1.1997 was withdrawn, however, the payment has already been made. In view thereof, no further direction needs to be passed by this Court.

The writ petition has become infructuous. The same is accordingly dismissed.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Chn/- Item No.55 U