Golu Thakur @ Shubham Raj @ Shambhu Raj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47325 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -475 Year- 2015 Thana -KANTI District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Golu Thakur @ Shubham Raj @ Shambhu Raj S/o Ashok Thakur R/o Village Syne Tole Brajlal, P.S.- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.
The application is for grant of bail in connection with Kanti PS case no. 475 of 2015 for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that the allegation against the petitioner is that he was seen going along with the deceased and except that there is nothing against the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody for about 07 months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that in para 14 of the case diary, it is stated that petitioner along with others has come to
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47325 of 2016 (3) dt.18-01-2017 2/2 the house of deceased and taken away the deceased along with them and thereafter, dead body of deceased was found. It is further submitted that petitioner is accused in large number of cases which is clear from para 3 of the petition.
Having heard both sides. It appears that in case diary, materials are available against the petitioner. In view of the fact that petitioner has criminal antecedent and he is accused in six other cases, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. As such, his prayer for bail rejected at this stage. However, lower court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) rinkee/- U T