Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42148/2015dismissed

Ramashish Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2015-10-13Mr. Justice Mungeshwar Sahoo2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42148 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2015 Thana -SIMRI District- BUXAR ====================================================== Ramashish Chaudhary son of late Muni Lal Chaudhary@Munni Lal Binnd, Resident of Village- Chand PaliBind Dera(Bind toli) P.s Simri, Distirct Buxar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Mohan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Rab(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER 13-10-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner, Ramashish Chaudhary, apprehends his arrest in Simri P.S. Case No.147 of 2015 giving rise POCSO case No.24 of 2015 registered under Section 8 of the said Act corresponding to G.R. Case No.1938 of 2015.

The allegation against this petitioner who is school master is that he is headmaster of the school, several times caused sexually harassed the daughter of the informant aged about 10 years. On 7.7.2015, same type of act was committed by him with the daughter of the informant who is student of class IV. The petitioner was also giving threatening to the daughter. The learned

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42148 of 2015 (2) dt.13-10-2015 2/2 counsel for the petitioner submitted that in fact the informant has demanded by rangdari for 4 lakhs from the petitioner but when the petitioner did not give the amount, the informant has falsely implicated the petitioner who is headmaster of the school and that there is delay of about one week in lodging the FIR. On the other hand, the learned A.P.P. objected the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Perused the FIR. There is direct allegation against the petitioner and the allegation is such that it is not possible to write even in this order and, therefore, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail application is rejected.

(Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) Sanjeev/- U