Amit Kumar @ Kallu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21583 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-472 Year-2019 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Amit Kumar @ Kallu Son of Ashok Singh @ Loha Singh, (M), aged about 30 years, Resident of Village - Vishunpura, P.S.- Sherghati, Dist.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1 The State of Bihar 2 Krishna Yadav (M), aged about 36 years, Son of late Munshi Yadav, Resident of Village Dewanpur, P.S. Sherghati, Dist. Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prithivi Raj Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-12-2020 Heard Mr. Prithivi Raj Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya, APP representing the State as also Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, appearing for the opposite party no.2.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 472 of 2019 registered for offences under sections 406 & 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

There is a case and counter case from both sides with regard to wrong accounting of money as well as not returning the money which was given to the petitioner in different stages.

It appears that the dispute is civil in nature.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21583 of 2020(3) dt.18-12-2020 2/2 Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case specifically the dispute being civil in nature, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st, Gaya in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 472 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.

It is made clear that if the party is aggrieved to settle the dispute, the Presiding Officer will take into consideration about settlement of dispute through mediation or any other mode as is available to him.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T