Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40381/2013disposed

Parshuram Kumar @ Parshuram Sao v. The State Of Bihar

2015-08-26Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40381 of 2013 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -10 Year- 2011 Thana -BIRUPUR SAHAYAK District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== Parshuram Kumar @ Parshuram Sao Son Of Khyali Sao Resident Of Jaynagar, Lali Pahari, Lakhisarai, P.S. And Distt.- Lakhisarai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Ranju Devi, D/o Shree Arjun Sao, R/o village Birupur, P.S. Birupur, District - Lakhisarai.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabi Bhushan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04/ 26-08-2015 The petitioner has renewed his prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with Birupur P.S. Case No. 10 of 2011 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 494 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of learned SDJM, Lakhisarai. The petitioner was earlier granted provisional anticipatory bail on submission of the petitioner that the petitioner is still ready to keep the informant as wife with full dignity and honour. The provisional bail was to be confirmed by the learned court below on substantial restoration of the matrimonial harmony within a period of one year or if the informant deliberately refuses to reside with the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40381 of 2013 (04) dt.26-08-2015 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the petitioner makes no effort to reconcile the issue. Considering the fact that the petitioner was earlier granted provisional anticipatory bail vide order dated 04.01.2012 and executed bail bond, the second anticipatory bail application is not maintainable as he was in deemed custody of the court.

Let the learned court below consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner, if he surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks, keeping in view of the fact that the informant is still ready to reconcile the issue. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T