Saryug Prasad And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14396 of 2015 ====================================================== 1.

Saryug Prasad and Ors Son of Sri Doman Yadav, Resident of Village P.O. P.S. - Asthawan, District - Nalanda.

2.

Bachchan Prasad Singh, Son of Late Bhawani Singh, Resident of VIllage P.O. - Bhagwatipur Kaimur, P.S. -Pandarak, District - Patna. 3.

Awadhesh Prasad, Son of Late Gobardhan Yadav, Resident of Village - Eatwan, P.S. - Paraiya, District - Gaya.

4.

Krishna Ballabh Prasad, Son of Late Amrit Mahto, Resident of Village - Hemda, P.S. - Warsaliganj, District - Nawada. 5.

Amresh Kumar Pathak, Son of Late Subhankar Pathak, Resident of Village - Karanpur, P.S. and District- Supaul.

6.

Suresh Rajak, Son of Late Jago Rajak, Resident of Village - Sahpur, P.S. - Udakishanganj, District - Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Deputy Secretary Revenue Administration, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Dehri - on - Sone, District - Rohtas.

5.

The Superintending Engineer, Sone Canal Circle, Ara Bhojpur, Water Resources Department, Ara.

6.

The Executive Engineer, Sone Canal Division, Ara Bhojpur, water Resources Department, District - A 7.

The Executive Engineer, Sone Canal Division, Buxar, Water Resources Department, District - Buxar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Satish Chandra Jha-3, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr. P.K. Verma, AAG 5 Mr. Suman Kr. Jha, AC to AAG 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14396 of 2015(2) dt.22-12-2022 2/2 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 21.06.2018 passed in CWJC No.18144 of 2010 (Nageshwar Prasad Yadav Vs. The State of Bihar & others).

Considering the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 21.06.2018 passed in CWJC No.18144 of 2010 (Nageshwar Prasad Yadav Vs. The State of Bihar & others).

(Sandeep Kumar, J) BT/- U