Rajoo Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19174 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2018 Thana- MADANPUR DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== Rajoo Singh aged about 30 years, male, Son of Mahendra Singh Resident of Village - Dihulee, P.S.- Madanpur, Distt - Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mrs. Leelawati Kumari, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 29-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 310 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely on the accusation that the stolen Bolero vehicle was found parked near the house of the petitioner. Even though it has been mentioned that some of the villagers had named the petitioner, the seizure list has not signed by any independent witness. Admittedly, the recovery has been made not from the house of the petitioner but from near his house. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19174 of 2019(2) dt.29-03-2019 2/2 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 310 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T