Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22026 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2021 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.
RAKESH KUMAR @ RAKESH KUMAR RAY Son of Ram Baran Ray Resident of Village - Mahisarai, P.S. - Ujiarpur, District - Samastipur, at present resident of Village - Belbanna, P.S. - Dalsinghsarai, District - Samastipur.
2.
DHARAMVEER KUMAR son of Ram Uday Mahto @ Uday Mahto Resident of Village - Mahmadpur, Sakara, P.S. - Bibhutipur, District - Samastipur, at present resident of Village - Belbanna, P.S. - Dalsinghsarai, District - Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Surya Narayan Roy, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Upendra Kumar, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-10-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the informant.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No. 103 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegation, the informant was getting his house plastered meanwhile the accused persons including the petitioners came to his semi built house and at the order of co-accused Dev
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22026 of 2022(2) dt.10-10-2022 2/2 Narayan Singh the petitioners assaulted the informant with iron rod and they also snatched gold chain from the neck of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated. There is case and counter case and the injuries are simple in nature. On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., 1st, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No. 103 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/- U T