Md. Imran v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1608 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -321 Year- 2015 Thana -PANCHRUKHI District- SIWAN ====================================================== Md. Imran, son of Mohd. Ishlam, resident of house No. 85/5, Dupty Ka Paraw, P.S. - Raypurwa, District - Kanpur Nagar (U.P). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ------------- 19-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Panchrukhi P.S. Case No.321 of 2015 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. In course of investigation, one Sanihoor was apprehended in connection with Siwan Town (Sarai O.P.) P.S. Case No.30 of 2016, who confessed his guilt in that case and also confessed in committing the dacoity in the present case alongwith 17 persons including the petitioner. Thereafter, some looted articles of the present case were recovered

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1608 of 2017 (2) dt.19-01-2017 2/2 from the house of Sahinoor. Thereafter, the petitioner was remanded in Siwan Town (Sarai O.P.) P.S. Case No.30 of 2016 on 13.01.2016 and then remanded in the present case on 09.08.2016. Thereafter, the petitioner is remanded in several other cases also. Further submission is that, in fact, nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 09.08.2016 in the present case and while the informant has claimed to identify the culprits on seeing them again but the petitione has not been put on T.I. Parade.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Pachrukhi P.S. Case No.321 of 2015. Out of the two sureties, one must be close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he/she is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T