Chandrika Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22340 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-418 Year-2021 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
CHANDRIKA PRASAD Son of Late Harnath Prasad Resident of Village - Madhaurah Khurd, P.S. Madhaurah, District - Saran. 2.
Pujesh Kumar @ Pujesh Babu Soni Son of Chandrika Prasad Resident of Village - Madhaurah Khurd, P.S. Madhaurah, District - Saran. 3.
Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Soni Son of Chandrika Prasad Resident of Village - Madhaurah Khurd, P.S. Madhaurah, District - Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 has antecedent of three cases and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 have antecedent of two cases.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of dispute relating to land the present occurrence is alleged to have been committed, it is also submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22340 of 2022(2) dt.07-11-2022 2/3 petitioner no.1 is own uncle of the informant and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are sons of petitioner no.1, it is further submitted that allegation of assaulting the informant is against Puppu and petitioner no.1 has been alleged to be an order giver and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are alleged to have dragged the informant inside the house and also gave dab to Pappu for assaulting the informant, it is next submitted that no doubt one of the injuries suffered by the informant is grievous, but then the allegation of assault is not against the petitioners.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Marhourah P.S. Case No. 418 of 2021 subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22340 of 2022(2) dt.07-11-2022 3/3 conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T