Abhishek Yadav @ Abhishek Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22790 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2022 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani ====================================================== ABHISHEK YADAV @ ABHISHEK KUMAR YADAV S/o- SRI MADAN YADAV Village- Korahia Ps- Jaynagar Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-05-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 81 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution story, the informant runs CSP of SBI at Sukhi Saifan Chouk and he comes there from his home except holidays. On 21.05.2022 at about 10.00AM, he reached SBI Branch of Khajauli and withdraw 384000 and he kept all the amount in a Blue colour bag. After keeping the amount in bag, informant proceeded for his CSP centre by motorcycle. While the informant was on his way in the meantime on a motorcycle on which three miscreants were

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22790 of 2023(2) dt.17-05-2023 2/2 riding overtook the informant and stopped the motorcycle and tried to snatch the bag containing money but the informant resisted but on the point of pistol, the miscreants succeeded in snatching the bag and thereafter they fled away. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.09.2022 and the petitioner is not named in F.I.R.

Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail and the petitioner also deserves to be released on bail. Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

The petitioner has eight antecedents. It has come during investigation that the petitioner is a member of the organized gang and from the C.D.R., it appears that they were active at the place of occurrence.

Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined grant bail to the petitioner.

This application stands rejected.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T