Bishwanath Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25795 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2021 Thana- JHANJHARPUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Bishwanath Sah Son Of Late Ram Sevak Sah Resident Of Village - Kanhauli, Ward No.06, P.S. - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani 2.

Shanti Devi W/O Shyam Sundar Sah Resident Of Village - Kanhauli, Ward No.06, P.S. - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani 3.

Pinki Devi Wife Of Dhurb Sah Resident Of Village - Kanhauli, Ward No.06, P.S. - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Udeshya Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-05-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 307, 379, 354B of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are women and they have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating to land. It is further submitted that petitioner No. 1 is a senior citizen aged about 65 years and has remained a person with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25795 of 2024(2) dt.06-05-2024 2/2 clean antecedent all throughout. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that even women of the family have been implicated in order to coerce the entire family of the petitioner No. 1 into submission.

4.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

5.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jhanjharpur P.S. Case No. 92 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T