Dineshwar Lal Deo @ Jhimi Lal Deo v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21984 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2021 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR DistrictDarbhanga ====================================================== DINESHWAR LAL DEO @ JHIMI LAL DEO S/o Late Ramphal Lal Deo R/o village- Panta, P.S.- Sadar Sonki (O.P.), District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pradeep Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-10-2022 Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 324, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is said to have attacked to the informant along with other co-accused persons.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21984 of 2022(3) dt.17-10-2022 2/2 case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He submits that there is specific overt act against other co-accused Ranjeet Lal Deo. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has two criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sadar Sonki (O.P.) P.S. Case No. 171 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T