Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22246/2023bail rejected

Jitendra Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-24Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22246 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-09 Year-2023 Thana- SIKANDRA District- Jamui ====================================================== JITENDRA MANDAL SON OF JATADHARI MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BHANDARI, PO- KONAN, PS- SIKANDRA, DISTT- JAMUI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukul Jee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 24-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for informant.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sikandra P.S. Case No. 09 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

There is allegation of assault by means of 'Garasa' on the head of the informant attributed to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a case of false implication. The parties are in fact co-villagers and based on extraneous considerations, the allegation has been levelled against the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22246 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 2/2 Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for informant have opposed the prayer for pre-arrest bail. It is submitted that the assault is attributed against the petitioner and the same is corroborated by the x-ray report. The injury has been sustained on the left parietal region of the head of the informant and is grievous in nature.

Considering the rival submissions, the nature of allegations and material in the investigation, noted above, this Court is not inclined to allow petitioner's prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. The same is rejected.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SUMIT/- U