← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31327/2021bail granted

Rashbihari Gope @ Ras Bihari Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-17Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31327 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-570 Year-2020 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== RASHBIHARI GOPE @ RAS BIHARI SINGH SON OF LATE SEWAK GOPE R/O VILLAGE- MAUJIPUR FATUHA, P.S.- FATUHA, DISTRICTPATNA, PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF FATEHJAMPUR (FATEHJANGPUR) SABALPUR, P.S.- NADI THANA, DISTRICT- PATNA. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 17-02-2022 This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case no. 570 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 420, 406, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, informant had given an

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31327 of 2021(2) dt.17-02-2022 2/3 amount of Rs. 1,51,000/- as advance to the petitioner to execute a sale deed to which later on he denied. Neither he had returned the said money nor had executed a sale deed in favour of the informant.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. In fact, petitioner is an illiterate person and taking the advantage of his literacy, informant has taken the thumb impression on the agreement for sale during pendency of First Appeal before the Hon'ble Court to grab his 1/3 share of total land.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case no. 570 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Patna City subject to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31327 of 2021(2) dt.17-02-2022 3/3 conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U