Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41175/2016bail granted

Rakesh Ranjan @ Pappu v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-29Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41175 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -272 Year- 2016 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Rakesh Ranjan @ Pappu, Son of late Ashok Kumar Sharma, Resident of Village- Arijpur, P.S. Kanti, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 29-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2016 in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 272 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 420, 467, 504 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in a dispute which is purely civil in nature. Petitioner, being merely witness in the sale deed, stands on far better footing than co-accused Sangita Ojha, the purchaser in the sale deed, who has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 32783 of 2016.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 272 of 2016 with the following conditions:

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41175 of 2016 (2) dt.29-09-2016 2/2 (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Ibrar U T