Arvind Kumar Trivedy v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6125 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.
Arvind Kumar Trivedy Son of Mahesh Trivedi Resident of Village- Chak Barkurwa, Bishundatpur, P.S.- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur. 2.
Mukesh Kumar Son of Kameshwar Chaudhary Resident of VillageChakbarkurwa, Panapur Haveli, P.S.- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur. 3.
Ram Chandra Choudhary Son of Late Hanuman Choudhary Resident of Village- Chak Barkurwa, Bishundatpur, P.S.- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur. 4.
Vijay Chaudhary Son of Ram Janam Chaudhary Resident of Village- Chak Barkurwa, Bishundatpur, P.S.- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Union of India through Principal Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum, New Delhi.
3.
The Director, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., cum Saksham Office, Pipe Line Project, Pandey Tola, Railway Gumti, Vishumnpur, Ward No.-07, Jivdhara, P.S.- Piprakothi, East Champaran, 845429.
4.
The Commissioner, Tirhut Range, Tirhut Commissioner, Muzaffarpur. 5.
The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.
6.
The DCLR, West, Muzaffarpur.
7.
The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 8.
The DCLR, East Champaran at Motihari.
9.
Nayayalay Saksham Pradhikar, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., M.M.P.L., Project, Nirman Karyalay, I.R.P.L., Patna, Hira Niketan, Kaliket Nagar, Beli Road, Patna- 801503.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Yugal Kishore, Advocate Ms. Rupa Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) ======================================================= (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/ Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential
2/4 ofÏces/residences. Also, the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/ofÏces.) ======================================================= Date : 24-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioners have prayed for the following relief(s):-
3/4 After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not to be in favour with the submissions made across the Bar, learned counsel for the petitioners, under instructions, states that the petitioners shall be content if the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the present petition reserving liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum and/or take recourse to such other alternative remedies, equally efficacious in law. Permission granted.
We are sure that as and when any such proceedings are initiated, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
Needless to add, the authorities/adjudicative body shall pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits. All issues are left open.
The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
4/4 Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (S. Kumar, J) Amrendra/PKP AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 29.06.2022 Transmission Date