Ranjit Mahto @ Ranjeet Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45084 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2012 Thana -NAWAKOTHI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Ranjit Mahto @ Ranjeet Mahto S/o Late Saket Mahto Resident of Village-Samsa, P.S.-Naokothi, District-Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2016 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner disclosing further more five cases lodged against the petitioner. Keep it on the record.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned A.P.P for the State as also the learned counsel for the Informant.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 18.02.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 53213 of 2015 on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 11.02.2015 and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration, to which the learned A.P.P. duly assisted by the learned counsel for the informant opposes prayer

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45084 of 2016 (2) dt.16-11-2016 2/2 for bail by submitting that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent and he is the convicted accused for the offence under section 302 of the I.P.C. and the petitioner and one Niranjan Mahto @ Niro fired which hit on the chest of Nawin Mahto causing his death.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail, again prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Sessions Trial No. 449 of 2015 arising out of Nawkothi P.S. Case No. 06 of 2012 pending in the court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Begusarai.

However, considering detention of the petitioner the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and to conclude the same preferably within a period of five months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T