← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7479/2017dismissed

Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-22Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7479 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -97 Year- 2016 Thana -TARIYANI CHOWK District- SHEOHAR ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar son of Kameshwar Singh @ Kamleshwar Singh, resident of village-Motnaje, P.S. Tariyani, Distt. Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hans Lal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-02-2017 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offences punishable under Sections 387 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that according to the allegation, petitioner has fired against the informant but the injury is only abrasion and nothing else. It has also been submitted that petitioner has demanded Rs.50,000/- from the informant but that allegation has been levelled due to the fact that the dispute arose in the marriage of the petitioner and because of that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that there

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7479 of 2017 (2) dt.22-02-2017 2/2 is demand from the informant and thereafter firing was made in this case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, the same is rejected.

However, petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below, i.e., learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar, in connection with Tariyani P. S. Case no. 97 of 2016 and make prayer for regular bail which will be considered by the court below itself on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T