Bipul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1560 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-608 Year-2017 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
BIPUL KUMAR SON OF KAUSHAL KISHORE SHARMA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - UCHIRMA, P.S. - SHERGHATI, DISTRICT - GAYA 2.
RAVISH KUMAR @ RAVISH SINGH BITTU SINGH SON OF SUDHIR SHARMA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - UCHIRMA, P.S. - SHERGHATI, DISTRICT - GAYA 3.
OM RANJAN KUMAR @ BAHADUR SINGH SON OF LATE ACHITANAND SHARMA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - UCHIRMA, P.S. - SHERGHATI, DISTRICT - GAYA 4.
DEEPAK KUMAR @ DEEPAK SINGH SON OF JOGENDRA SHARMA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - UCHIRMA, P.S. - SHERGHATI, DISTRICT - GAYA 5.
ANUJ KUMAR @ ANIRUDH SINGH SON OF SIYARAM SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - UCHIRMA, P.S. - SHERGHATI, DISTRICT - GAYA 6.
NIKHIL ANAND @ AMAN SINGH @ NIKIL ANAND SON OF UDAY SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - UCHIRMA, P.S. - SHERGHATI, DISTRICT - GAYA 7.
ATUL KUMAR @ ATUL SINGH SON OF UDAY SHARMA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - UCHIRMA, P.S. - SHERGHATI, DISTRICT - GAYA 8.
NITESH KUMAR @ GONGUL SINGH SON OF NARAMADESHWAR SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - UCHIRMA, P.S. - SHERGHATI, DISTRICT - GAYA ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
Mukesh Manjhi Son of Suresh Manjhi R/o Village- Uchirma, PS- Sherghati, Dist- Gaya ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
None.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026
1. No one appears on behalf of the appellants. Learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State is present.
2. The case was taken up on 25.06.2026. On the said
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1560 of 2024(7) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 date also, no one had appeared on behalf of the appellants.
3. Today also when the case is called out, no one appears on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants have lost interest in the case.
4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T