← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42075/2016bail granted

Md. Shadique v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-22Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42075 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -517 Year- 2016 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Md. Shadique, Son of Md. Ismaiel Ansari, Resident of Refuqee Colony Chauk, P.S.-Saharsa Sadar, District-Saharsa .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Madhav Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh 1 (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel representing the State as well as learned counsel for the informant.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S Case No. 517 of 2016 ( G.R. Case No. 1614 of 2016) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363/366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the daughter of the informant became traceless form her house and it is alleged that the petitioner has kidnapped her, during investigation the statement of the victim girl has been recorded under section 164 of Cr.P.C. wherein she has stated her age as 19 years and further she has stated that she went with the petitioner out of her own sweet will with consent and further performed marriage with him.

Submission is of false implication and that no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42075 of 2016 (2) dt.22-10-2016 2/2 offence as alleged is made out against the petitioner, the petitioner has been made victim due to high handedness of the police and the informant, the victim girl being the major has gone out of her own sweet will with consent with the petitioner and both have performed marriage and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P. duly assisted by the learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer of bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the statement of the victim girl recorded under section 164 of Cr.P.C., the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 517 of 2016 (G.R. Case No. 1614 of 2016), subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T