← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20597/2025bail granted

Rohit Singh @ Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-05Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20597 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-960 Year-2024 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Rohit Singh @ Rohit Kumar S/o- Gauri Shankar Singh Village- Baghaur PoMaima Gram Ps- Mahishi Dist- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Divya Dimple D/o- Arvind Kumar Singh, W/o- Rohit Singh VillageBaghaur Po- Maima Gram Ps- Mahishi Dist- Saharsa, P/A- Tuniyahi Ps Dist-Madhepura ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amarnath Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Adv.for OP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-08-2025 Pursuant to order of this Court, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court, but the dispute between the parties could not be resolved through the process of mediation and as such, mediation failed.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant / opposite party no. 2.

3. The petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Section 85 of B.N.S. and Section 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

4. Petitioner is alleged to have committed torture and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20597 of 2025(4) dt.05-08-2025 2/3 harassment with opposite party no. 2 for dowry.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner denies the allegation made in the present petition and submits that he never committed torture to opposite party no. 2 or demanded any dowry. He further submits that opposite party no. 2 is also a working lady. However, the petitioner undertakes to give Rs. 5,000/-per month by way of temporary relief/solace, starting from this month, to the opposite party no.2.

6. In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give temporary relief/solace of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) per month to the opposite party no. 2, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Madhepura in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 960 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as on the following conditions:- "(1) Opposite party no. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her savings bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20597 of 2025(4) dt.05-08-2025 3/3

(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid amount per month in the savings bank account of the opposite party no. 2.

(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the aforesaid amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

(4) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise."

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T